Calling BS on CNE Entry Fees for People with Disabilities
Isn’t that nice of me?
Instead of swearing in the title of my post, I tried to be a bit more polite. I
suspect swearing will come later.
This year The Ex, the affectionate nickname for the annual
Canadian National Exhibition in Toronto, will cease a previous policy of free
admission for people with disabilities and they
will now be charged the regular amount ($18 for
adults). According to the CNE General Manager Virginia Ludy, this decision
was made in an effort to show “respect, treating
persons with disabilities with dignity, independence, equality of access and
inclusion.”
And this is where I
started swearing.
Treating people with
disabilities with dignity and independence? Equality of access and inclusion?
What
crap!
A very high number of
people with disabilities rely on a social assistance program called Ontario
Disability Support Program (ODSP). The base amount of the ODSP is $800 a month,
which may increase somewhat depending on whether the individual needs funding
for medical supplies or a special diet.
$800. Even if the
person lives in a subsidized or rent geared to income apartment, that’s not a
lot of money. The rising cost of food is not reflected in this amount, neither
is a need for over-the-counter drugs, pet food, transportation (a bus/subway
ticket is $3.35 for a one-way ticket), and all the other expenses of daily
living. Most people with disabilities I know barely make it through the month.
Many rely on food banks.
For many, finding $18
for a CNE ticket is not going to happen unless they take money from something
else. Something else that is necessary because ODSP does not allow for someone
to buy frivolous things. By ending the policy of allowing people with
disabilities free access to The Ex, the Canadian National Exhibition will in
fact be placing a barrier to equality of access that will exclude people with
disabilities from participating in a time-honoured tradition of going to the
fair at the end of summer.
This is not about equality,
it’s about equity. The difference is brilliantly illustrated in this image from
the Interaction
Institute for Social Change (Artist: Angus Maguire).
When you treat people equally, not everyone
gets to see the game or go to the fair. When you approach removing barriers
from an equity perspective, everyone gets to go. Apparently the CNE does not
understand this. (Of course they do. Any major organization does)
The rate of unemployment among people with
disabilities is 50 percent. FIFTY PERCENT! When you add underemployment to the
mix, we are looking at approximately 80 percent of people with disabilities
either not having a job or not being able to find a job that pays a decent
amount. We face numerous barriers to participation in everyday life — physical,
attitudinal, and financial.
In addition to the smokescreen about how
this is really about creating more equal access and inclusion, Ludy also
defends this change in policy by mentioning that other major Toronto
attractions charge regular prices for people with disabilities. Defending creating a barrier to equal participation by
saying that someone else does it, too, is not a good reason. The Toronto Zoo charges half-price for a visitor who has a disability.
Apparently, it was not convenient for the CNE to model their policy change
after the Zoo.
Here’s the thing… The CNE is completely
within their rights to do whatever they want with their entry fees. Would it be
nice if they acknowledged the financial barriers to participation in the fair
experience by people with disabilities and reflected this in the entry fee?
Absolutely. Do they have to do this? No, they don’t.
Well, I actually feel that all major
attractions ought to adjust pricing for people with disabilities, but that is my
opinion and unfortunately, I don’t have the power to make them. ‘Scuse the
sidetrack.
The problem with this story is the
hypocrisy of the GM of the CNE claiming that creating this financial barrier is
something they do for the benefit of people with disabilities. That it will
create more equal access, independence, and that it is more dignified. And oh
yes, that it will be more inclusive.
And that, my dear readers, is bullshit.
Pure unadulterated bullshit.
Update, July 7, 2016: after strong reaction in the community and the media, the CNE has reversed their position and will continue to enable people with disabilities to get in for free. They will also all public consultations on their admissions policy and prices. This is proof that advocating and sharing your opinion can result in a win.
Comments
Surely access is important for everyone. Not those who can afford it the best,